Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Multiple attacks in London
Topic Started: Jun 4 2017, 12:29 AM (1,457 Views)
+ Sandy Shore
Default Avatar


...
Edited by Sandy Shore, Nov 7 2017, 08:41 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Sandy Shore
Jun 8 2017, 08:16 PM
If anyone is tempted to slap me with the ever useless platitude that it is "not all Muslims", or anything remotely resembling it, do note that I never once said it was, but also note that it has been suggested that considerably more than half of British Muslims would not report Muslim extremism. Not all of them, but a lot more than half would appear to, at the very least, seemingly have no regard for the attacks on the country they're being supported in, and the barbaric killings of its innocent civilians in the name of their religion, if not outright, clandestine support of it.
People coming from a completely different culture with their own mindsets and religion don't instantly adopt the ideas of the place they moved to? Shocking.

Also important to note:

Quote:
 
The survey was conducted on a random sample of 1,081 British Muslims aged 18 and over.


That's like just a quarter of the population of my town in bumf*** nowhere, pretty s*** sample size for such a big claim.


It's pretty clear that attitudes of many of them change over time anyway, they'll adjust to this country not take it over unless we all just bend over backwards for them and make Sharia Law come in to play, seems doubtful.

How many of those people were old and set in their ways or young and hadn't got past the religious brainwashing? That's the interesting statistic.

Quote:
 
Not surprising when you consider the consistent reluctance of many to condemn such attacks, even when asked, and the polls that suggest sympathy for the murderers, among other troubling things.


You mean like when they refuse to offer any funeral services for the people who carry out the attacks, quite publicly denouncing them?


Showing ISIS we're not scared is good in the end because it weakens their resolve if they believe they're not making a difference, maybe they'll stop before we manage to hunt them all down and realize how pointless their struggle is.
Edited by Steve, Jun 8 2017, 09:43 PM.
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Sandy Shore
Default Avatar


...
Edited by Sandy Shore, Nov 7 2017, 08:48 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Quote:
 
The response, however, should not be to psychotically endanger the peoples of Europe or elsewhere because you feel a little sad at the thought of impeding their desire to live in a more charitable and tolerant country that many of them have absolutely no allegiance to nor feel they owe any thanks, or whose ways they simply abhor. Not all, but many.


I wouldn't call being compassionate psychotic but, okay.


Quote:
 
Contrary to what nutcases believe, Europe doesn't owe all the down-trodden of the world a good home, and it certainly shouldn't be sacrificing the blood of its own innocent people to that end just because you and others feel better doing so.


Actually, I'm really not bothered. They can live here so long as they don't try to make everyone follow their line of thought and so long as they contribute which many do. More than a lot of people born here.

The reality is that they are being taken in anyway.
They aren't the problem, the bad ones among them are.
Once they're deported, jailed or whatever what is the problem? Better detection methods and less dicking around letting known extremists live here and ISIS' hope of infiltrating is pretty f***ed.

Quote:
 
If a certain group of people (of European descent) had a history of ongoing child abuse, and they asked a thousand random people from that community whether they would report it should they know it was going on, but two-out-of-three of those asked said they wouldn't, you would be with them in screaming bloody murder. You would be slamming your head on the keyboard in frothing outrage.


That really depends on various things...

How large is this group? How connected is this group? Is it a country full of people or a country full of different groups with different ideologies that ought not to be judged together?
If it was one family and it seemed to be some sick family tradition then yeah I would assume the rest of the family are either in on it or know about it and do nothing.

Otherwise the factors are extremely important there or else it's just a ridiculous nonsense situation without them.

Talk about bending something to your narrative, dude. Surely you don't think what you described there makes any sense with such vague detail.

Quote:
 
They'll adjust and change (for the better) based on what, exactly? Not their views on homosexuality, obviously, since more than half of them think homosexuality should be illegal. With, I believe, about a quarter of them thinking that it should be punishable by death.


Sorry but...so?

The first world still barely wraps it's head around homosexuality, there's rampant homophobia everywhere still so why are we to expect this lot to come around right away when we still aren't there yet?

Living in a country that doesn't have anti-gay propaganda everywhere and a lot of gay people is sure to alter some perceptions and if not they can leave.
Plenty Christians think the same about homosexuality many are just less vocal, lets kick out all the scheming Christians just based on that?

Quote:
 
43% of British Muslims want Sharia Law. Only 22% were against it. That's a massive majority, and with the remaining 35% of those asked seemingly open to the idea...


And that 43% is what compared to the whole population? It's not like they get to decide if Sharia Law gets put in place, the rest of the country doesn't agree with them. Troubling that nearly half want it but...yet another thing subject to change over time, generations down the line that won't be such a high percentage unless you can show otherwise.
They're human beings at the end of the day, it's not like they're all going to see Muslim's having bombed a school on the news and think "Another win for the good guys!" younger generations that actually grow up with the people who live here will think differently.


Quote:
 
You completely disregarded an unbiased statistic and expressed interest in a statistic that you think would somehow make these views acceptable and benign...

Just over 1000 people with little information provided otherwise is an unbiased statistic to base the thoughts and feelings of the whole group on? Come on.

Quote:
 
27% of British Muslims expressed sympathy with the Charlie Hebdo murderers


"Sympathy"

What does that even mean? That's such a vague term.

Were they sympathetic and hoping the murderers would kill absolutely everyone? Or were they sad that the murderers were brought to that?

There's completely different levels of sympathy, you can be sympathetic for someone who did horrible s*** without supporting what they did.
Like the Pulse Club shooter, it's a shame that they were clearly very repressed and made to feel like their being homosexual was a bad thing, leading them to such a devastating breaking point.

Am I saying it's good that they killed 50 people or whatever? No. It's just sad they felt they had to do that.

"Sympathetic" is a very broad term.


Quote:
 
Still, that's the reason given, and they're evidently the kind of people that are motivated to defend their religion by outright lying about it. That's problematic.


So like, all religion then pretty much? This is hardly unique to Muslims. Why is this discussion about them and not abolishing all religion, that's hardly a point against Muslims in particular.

No Christian or otherwise says the Bible is stupid for saying a man shall not lie with another man, disagreeing with your belief is kind of the opposite of what being religious is...
Cherry picking what you want to believe and follow is the way it goes, not saying that parts of your religion suck even if they blatantly do.


Quote:
 
They're not making a difference in what? They clearly are making a difference - a difference in the number of dead infidel children in the name of their god and religion.


In the grander scheme of things they aren't though, they're not winning, it's obvious they're not winning. They spend weeks, months or even years planning attacks and they only manage to kill like a few tens of people at best, when we do that to them at the push of a button with some missiles. Complete jokes.

The only difference they really make is the exact fear we shouldn't show.


Quote:
 
You think their objective is to get a rise out of people and have them say "curse those Muslims"? Which pumps them all up for another round? When have any of them ever uttered such an asinine thing? This is the claims and delusions of politicians and apologists alone. Of which you are one. Weed out one terrorist that has ever claimed they motivated to try and "make a difference" in the amount of people that go to concerts or whatever nonsense it is that you're spouting.


...weed out one that supports what you say? A lot of huffing and puffing on your end.

It's pretty obvious that building fear is a big part of it or do you think they don't want us to submit and let them have their caliphate crap?

Do you really think they're stupid enough to believe they're going to manage to kill all the many millions of people that live here by killing like 50-100 people a year? (talking UK, cba getting exact or broader numbers)
Obviously not. Breaking the populace and getting them to submit their desires is pretty clearly the only win they can hope to get. Basic bully logic.

It's a win they obviously won't get if people stay strong.
Edited by Steve, Jun 9 2017, 06:57 PM.
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Sandy Shore
Default Avatar


...
Edited by Sandy Shore, Nov 7 2017, 08:57 AM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Quote:
 
Doing so at the expense of others, to the point it becomes a numbers game (helping enrich and support more lives than the terrorists and rapists destroy), is completely devoid of compassion. It's the pursuit of an ideology; the sacrificing of the few(er) for the sake of the many (more).
That's your position entirely, whether you realise it or not. I find it absolutely reprehensible.


And you're position is that we shouldn't help any of them because a good amount of them may or may not be problem people and that our people are more important than the lives of theirs and their future children.
Very compassionate. In a twisted nationalist sort of way.


Quote:
 
There are ways of trying to help them that don't endanger uninvolved, non-consensual civilians that neither caused the problems these other people face nor owe a solution to them. Ways of helping that don't create ghettos of violence and abuse that resemble the countries these people have been coming from. That being a different discussion that you'll never move on to, anyway.


Much like the people forced to live in these s***ty countries that by no means ask for the way they are. Just because some of them aren't grateful and a much smaller portion of them are potentially dangerous doesn't mean they don't deserve a chance at a decent life, if not just for the children they do or will have.

That would be a better discussion to have rather than outright acting like we shouldn't take anyone in and be decent human beings just because some s***ty people are among them.

Quote:
 
the reality is that they're not all that's coming in. But, I know, you care more about the feels-goods than the death and abuse of civilians that wouldn't have had to suffer otherwise. Evidently.


Which extends to the people who live there, who live in far worse conditions than we do. But that doesn't matter because our people are superior humans that deserve safety more than they, I guess.

It's pretty evident that they should just suck it up and accept the s***ty conditions they live in and we're better than them to think that way? That sounds reasonable.

Quote:
 
but even then there is still a fundamental difference when considering which of them "contributes" or "drains" if that's the game you're trying to play.


A game which our people play too, plenty of us drain the country but there's nothing wrong with that because we live here even though both drain the country, it's fine for one selection of people to do it but if the other do it then they're in the wrong, that's a very fair way to judge them.

Quote:
 
While they may be finding acceptable employment, getting them initially sheltered and fed costs money; travel, phones and internet access et cetera so they might become employed costs money; medical care costs money


Yes and money matters much more than being good and trying to help fellow human beings. It would be nice and cheap to just round them all up and gas them, amazing we haven't done that yet when it drains so much money to help people.
We have plenty money to help. when politicians aren't making stupid decisions and reducing tax on the people who already have mountains and mountains of cash they'll never spend.

Quote:
 
Even if a native born is on benefits, the chances are very high that someone has been paying a portion of their share right up until they left school, and probably more.

Not to mention who's on benefits and who's simply unemployed. Plenty of native borns could reasonably be entirely funded by their parents, who might themselves be relatively well off. The vast, vast majority of unemployed coming in from the third world almost absolutely do not have other people paying their way in any way.


Firstly, got any actual proof for that?

Secondly, so? That's a cost of taking people in and giving them a home. Of course they don't have much to offer in return but if they're here to stay then eventually they're going to become financially stable and then they half to. A temporary problem.

Why the hell should we not take them in just because there are some negatives? That's just pathetic, we'll only help people if our own lives remain perfect?

Quote:
 
Furthermore, the community in this discussion that we're exclusively focusing on are far and away under performing compared to other immigrants according to the statistic cited by this Muslim man. I'd like to see you try to put a good spin on that, even for their own sake.


...alright so because 12% of them have found it hard to get jobs that's their fault and we should just kick them out?

How is that their fault when people who live here are apprehensive about hiring them, they don't all know our languages, they don't know our culture and many of them won't have been long.
That's just a silly thing to put a negative spin on. Of course they can't all get jobs right away.
They come here with nothing from a country where they had pretty much nothing and you expect them all to be getting jobs easily?

That's ridiculous. Completely ridiculous.

Now if they were all engineers, doctors, scientists and other high level workers before coming here it would be odd for them to not be finding work(if we ignore that it's hard to find jobs in any field) but that isn't the case. They are regular people, poor people, coming from a s*** country.
Yes their unemployment levels are going to be high.

Quote:
 
In-fact, eight-out-of-ten European countries that were polled said they did not want any more immigration from Muslim majority countries, with only an average 20% of those asked finding it within themselves to disagree with the statement compared to a 55% majority, so they're actually being taken in against many populace's desires to do so.


And there are many reasons people might feel that way all of which matter there.
Plenty ignorant people think they're all terrorists and in general the media puts a negative spin on it so why should I be surprised people are against it when media outlets feed them propaganda to turn them against it?

Just today in fact I seen a post about a Muslim woman helping a woman that collapsed on a bus and the comments were disgusting s*** like "She only helped for attention!" "So one of them is good out of thousands, so what" "That doesn't make them good people"

Plenty people pretty much don't even consider them human beings so unfortunately I find it hard to care for their weeping hearts, how dare people in war torn/terrible countries want to live somewhere safer. How f***ing dare they.
Entitled pricks the lot of them.
They have no right to want to live comfortably, I say sitting in my nice warm house in complete comfort and safety.


Quote:
 
and it certainly doesn't mean the best solution is to keep taking them in en masse and adding to the very evident problems that already exist in the countries they're going to


Definitely it isn't the best solution but not everything is going to turn out great for either side and pretty much can't so whining about it isn't providing a solid solution. When you agree to take people in you also agree to the negatives that come with that.

I don't think we agreed to take immigrants in thinking they'd come with bags of gold and fortunes to live off of, it's pretty apparent it'd have a cost and if you disagree with that cost...well that's fine. You are welcome to feel that way just as others are welcome to not.
When are sacrifices not made to help others?

Quote:
 
The lives they destroy before it ever gets to that point... Seriously? Did you not even watch the video I sent where Maajid discusses how deep an issue this is?


I don't subscribe to your bias so I'm not inclined to feel like it's the worst thing in the world, no.

If nothing else I'd rather see their children saved because it's kind of sick to not want to help them just because we're worried about the belt being a bit tighter. We'll live.


Quote:
 
Our liberal values typically don't include the hatred of, imprisonment of, or execution of people based on their sexuality. Pointing out that there's still something of a "fight" about this in our liberal countries makes it doubly nonsensical to keep increasing the numbers of people from a background where they typically have very intolerant, incompatible views about these things - triple if you consider a not insignificant number of them wish to have their own laws to govern themselves!


This really matters not. Unless they were to suddenly outnumber us they'd never get their way with that, why the hell would we suddenly start letting them execute homosexuals?
Seriously, do you honestly think that's some sort of eventuality? I don't even know what to say to that.


Quote:
 
And that wasn't even the point... I pointed out that statistic when you baselessly (as virtually everything you say has been) claimed that their views change (for the better) when they come to live in our countries. Based on what?


Based on what? How humans work maybe? How many cultures have mixed together over the years despite different beliefs, bad blood between them and all sorts of horrendous s***?

Only a few hundred years ago where England and Scotland constantly at it and while things can still be a bit touchy at times we're not murdering each other at the border constantly, last I checked.

History my dude. Half the s*** you're saying is far too soon to judge, you're saying a culture that's lived here in large numbers for a relatively short amount of time has absolutely no hope of integrating based on what? Can you predict the future?

Treating them with utter contempt is only going to make it worse, sending them away will just make more extremists and solidify the hatred of the ones already out there.

Quote:
 
What do you mean unless I can show otherwise? I've been showing you plenty of things that demonstrate very clearly how bad it already appears in the UK, how poorly these particular people appear to integrate, despite your claims that living here will make them all great, and it's perfectly clear that adding to that community with large numbers of people from places where their views are even worse could only exacerbate the issue, let alone prevent it from improving.


My claims that they'll integrate over time don't mean within like five minutes.
There have been Muslims in this country since like the 50's from what I read and shockingly they haven't all suddenly became terrorists and haven't all run to the aid of extremist Muslims.

There's somewhere between 2-3 million of them who were born in this country so yeah I'm not going to condemn say 2 million people for the views of like 600 of them. That's utter nonsense.
Seriously, complete nonsense. Where are the details on these 600 people or is it not convenient to show why they think that way?

That's as accurate as going to Arkansas to conduct a survey on how much Americans hate gay people and concluding that most Americans hate gay people because most people there would say they do.

Solid evidence.

Quote:
 
You are an ideologue. Plain and simple. In every single debate you engage, you take the position of an unsubstantiated ideologue.

No amount of demonstrating this will ever make you see.


This makes me feel like I'm talking to someone who reads The Sun and takes it word for word, sorry.


Quote:
 
The problem and fact is that there are people hell-bent on killing as many innocent civilians as they can in the name of their religion, abusing them because of their particular views, and the response is people saying nonsense like: "we may never know what drives someone to commit such an atrocity", when we clearly do. The problem is, instead of people saying that something should be addressed, and their governments actually doing something about it whenever they do, the response is to get together for a little sing-song and change profile pictures, while talking about how lovely a religion Islam is and how little it has to do with any of it.


Now this I agree is an issue. If it were up to me practising the religion would be banned for anyone who wants to come here, since it seems clear that people with their belief can be easy to manipulate.

That's a problem. But turning them all away does nothing to fix it.

All that would do is piss extremists off more and add greatly to their numbers.

Imagine being a young child on one of these boats, heading to what you hope is a new home where you won't get blown to bits.
But then you get told to piss off because you belong in your hellhole of a country and that they aren't willing to help you in your hour of need.

That would make anyone ripe for the picking. Surely you can see that? We need to raise their children with better ideals, not send them away to become brainwashed soldiers that will come back to fight us.


It's evident that things aren't being organized well but...that is the problem and we need solutions for that.
There is no cure all solution and it certainly isn't being dicks and turning innocent people away.
It sucks that they come with their iffy religion in tow but that's the way it is and it's no reason not to help people who genuinely require some humanity.


I'm not sure my keyboard will survive further discussion but it can try :rofl:
Edited by Steve, Jun 10 2017, 09:57 PM.
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
« Previous Topic · Deep Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2

Theme Designed by McKee91